The best way to handle an as-fired sample is to record a dummy placeholder in the shipment table. The placeholder would contain no tonnage, but would include fuel type and any information about the fuel's origin that is known. In this way, the identity of the fuels analyzed can be ascertained.
12. If the 90 percent confidence interval about the mean of my mercury contents is not +/-30 percent of
the mean, when must I increase my coal sampling/analysis frequency?
It is presumed (and strongly encouraged) that facilities will be following their coal analyses
throughout the reporting quarter and calculating the 90 percent confidence interval about the mean
amount of the mercury content of their coal(s) to determine if the mean falls within the +/- 30 percent
limit. If, near the end of a reporting quarter, a facility knows that their mean will fall outside this value,
they should begin more frequent sampling/analyses immediately upon the start of the new reporting
quarter. If the value is close but cannot be determined until all analyses for the quarter are in, the facility
should plan to increase the frequency as soon as the final results are in. A facility should not wait until
the end of the 45-day submittal period to increase the sampling/analysis frequency.
13. My plant gets 6 or fewer shipments a month and the 90 percent confidence interval about the
mean of my mercury contents will exceed +/-30 percent of the mean this quarter,
how frequently must I do my coal sampling/analysis next quarter?
Since all plants must sample/analyze every 6th shipment and a minimum of 3 analyses each month, all plants receiving 8 or fewer shipments and not meeting the +/-30 percent of the mean requirement for a quarter will continue having to perform an analysis on 3 shipments. If a plant receiving 8 or fewer shipments cannot meet the meet the +/-30 percent of the mean for a second consecutive quarter, the plant would have to analyze every shipment (with the exception of units receiving less than 3 shipments a month throughout the year who are permitted, for sake of sample consistency, to get more than 1 sample from each shipment to meet the 3 analysis minimum). Analyzing every shipment is the most comprehensive testing that EPA is requiring of any plant under Part II of the Mercury ICR. Even if the plant that starts analyzing every shipment still can't meet +/-30 percent of the mean for a quarter, there will be no additional analyses required beyond this.
To clarify this distinction, EPA's policy on sampling/analyzing scenarios for plants that never meet the +/-30 percent threshold is as follows:
| Number of Shipments |
1st Quarter 99 |
2nd Quarter 99 |
3rd Quarter 99 |
4th Quarter 99 |
| Plants receiving 3 or fewer shipments |
3 samples/analyses per month |
Same |
Same |
Same |
| Plants receiving 4 to 8 shipments |
Minimum 3 samples/analyses per month |
Minimum 3 samples/analyses per month |
Analyze every shipment |
Analyze every shipment |
| Plants receiving 9 to 17 shipments |
Minimum 3 samples/analyses per month |
Analyze every 3rd shipment, minimum 3 samples/analyses per month |
Analyze every shipment |
Analyze every shipment |
| Plants receiving 18 or greater shipments |
Every 6th shipment per month needs to be sampled and analyzed, minimum 3 samples/analyses per month |
Every 3rd shipment per month needs to be sampled and analyzed, minimum 3 samples/analyses per month |
Analyze every shipment |
Analyze every shipment |